Their comfort level, which speaks of marriage and money, may have changed. Or the choice that a parent stays at home to raise children may lead you to reconsider this type of agreement. If you don`t do it before you get married, it`s possible to make a post-wedding arrangement – so it`s not too late at any time! There are several ways to attack a marital agreement in court. These include lack of volunteerism, lack of scruples and lack of disclosure of assets.  In all U.S. states, it is not permissible to address issues relating to children of marriage, particularly custody and access issues.  The reason is that children`s issues must be decided in the best interests of children.  However, this is controversial: some people think that, as custody disputes are often the worst part of a divorce, couples should be able to settle this in advance.  In several European countries such as France, Belgium, the Netherlands, Germany, Poland, Switzerland, Sweden, Denmark, Norway and Finland, marital agreements have long been considered valid. While in some of these countries, limits apply to restrictions enforceable or valid by the courts (for example.
B Germany after 2001, when the appelncies courts indicated it), a written and duly initiated contract, which was freely concluded, cannot be challenged, for example by arguing the circumstances in which the marriage broke down or where the marriage reigned. In France and Belgium (as in Quebec, which has the same judicial tradition), marital agreements must be concluded in the presence of a notary. If you or your partner answered yes to one or more of these questions, a marriage agreement may be in your best interest. If you answered no to all of them, it is likely that there is no need for prenup, but can still be used to protect your current or future assets. Some federal laws apply to conditions that may be included in a pre-marital contract. The Withdrawal Equity Act (REA) of 1984, signed on August 23, 1984 by President Ronald Reagan, reconciled confusion over whether ERISA anticipated state divorce laws, thereby preventing pension plans from complying with court injunctions granting a spouse a portion of the worker`s pension in a divorce decree.  A matrimonial agreement may include exceptions whererightly agrees to revoke all rights against the other`s pension benefits arising from state and federal marriage laws, as in the context of the REA.